Monday 24 September 2012

'Friends of Friends' at the Weeknight Gallery

I admit, I withhold certain cynicism within the art world; there are some things I can respect, yes, but I will not feel obliged to say I agree and like them.

'Friends of Friends' is a group show of, what the name entails, friends of friends, of friends. The exhibit combined extremely different works of 22 artists of the same generation (some without formal training or craft)and exhibited them in the same space. What I found most fascinating of this exhibit was the difference between one work and another, yet it was also what I found less enjoyable.

The interesting factor of combining works of different artists, yet all belonging to the same generation, is to see the variety within them. There is the bad habit of generalizing a generation's motifs and placing their 'tendencies' in an undiverse pile. In 'Friends of Friends' there exists a variety of works containing satire, abstractionism and representation, among others. The amount of contrast between these artists fights the uneducated approach of generalizing the art and interests of a specific generation.

Yet, within this vast and extremist approach to diversity, I must state it produces deep discomfort within me. To combine such different styles, subject matters, artistic knowledge and technique provides a rather unorganized aesthetic and flow to the show. And, within contrasting works of art, there are some I believe hold themselves higher than others.

That being said, I think it's great to have a collaboration of different artists to put up one show, yet, in all honesty, it's something difficult to 'pull off' well.

Hoorah! Bettina.

Tuesday 18 September 2012

Trip to Robert Blackburn Gallery

Upon recieving the news that our class will be meeting in Times Square, my face slumped, it seemed so unappealing to visit artist studios in a place that falsifies and mutates New York City into this completely commercial and consumer-friendly tourist block. A place where the shiny bright, panoramic screens with the highest technology advertise for a product you don't need or a fancy model that makes you feel physically incompitent yet mentally alieviated. But it's no use complaining, friends from class and myself make our way around the crowded, and obnoxiously stimulating tumult towards an artists studio around the area to meet with the rest.

As we, bewildered, stood around the pre-determined address, we waited for quite a bit, until everyone caught up. After much hessitant patience and indetermined time-passing, we made our way inside the studio.

The area was interesting. I always pictured an artist studio as a, many would call, 'bohemian' atmosphere, yet upon entering this building, it looked like the reception lobby for a crestfallen apartment building. (And I state this in the kindest of forms)

As we reach the Second floor and enter the Robert Blackburn artist studio, my eyes, dull from the excessive travel ventures and all around silly environment, light up to see what is this studio. It faintly resembled the printshop I usally work in by having various presses, but that was it. The rest looked so 'professional' (if I could be so vague). Organization was clearly set out everywhere and those using the machienery were careful, calculated and neat; something the printshop I usually work in tends to lack. I wouldn't say it was 'love' at first site, but it surely was engaging and hopeful from the perspective of a student of the arts, such as myself.

Our professor greeted a scruffy man in the printshop in a friendly manner, something I understood as less professional and more friendly than anything. This encounter came to make more sense upon the scruffy man's introduction; they had both studied together in college, one a year above the other. This could seem like a completely unrelevant observation, yet I wanted to state it because they both graduated from the college I am currently attending and, at least for me, it gives a sense of relief to believe someone that studied in my same academia is working in such a lovely environment, working on what he actually got a degree on. Also, the concept of mantaining communication with those that attended college with you is a wonderful thing that, one day, I hope to experience years after my graduation.

The tour of the Robert Blackburn Studio had begun and, though sounding expensive to become a member of it, the facilities and conditions sounded very appealing for a printmaker. The thought of renting time to use a studio seemed foreign, to say the least, yet practical and less stressful. By paying for said facilities, one would never had to deal with a mound of scatterbrained people doing their prints the night before their 8:30 class. This was just a beautiful concept, pricy, yet beautiful.

While the tour went on, our 'tourguide'(if you will) showed us varous artists works and their methodology. It was fascinating to hear other more experienced and neat processes for the same thing I, supposedly, know how to do in the most basic of fashions. I could easily say this was the most educational section in terms of the craft of printmaking, rather than the occupation of it.

As the tour of the printshop concluded, we all centered around our guide as he came to present verious projects the Robert Blackburn Studio had fueled and those it has produced. He showed us prints of famous artitsts, commissioned by the Studio, where the studio printed the artists work and kept half, to thus spread the artistic talent. The thought of printing someone else's work is frantic, yes, but it's an exciting challenge to do a large series with no mistakes and as much neatness as possible. This idea was very luring to myself.

The other section of this 'huddle' included our tourguide presenting a magazine called 'Carrier Pidgeon'. This is a concept he, and various artists had developed as they met in various places, one being the Robert Blackburn Gallery. The concept was very enticing and also quite useful. Each issue presented a set of artists along with some of their work. Some were decent, skilled in the craft yet unmoving in the art, but some were quite amazing, these artists inspired yet frightened me with the thought that my art would one day have to compare with people at this level. All in all, the magazine was very well done and published and the circumstance of various artists getting together to produce this is simply awestriking.

As we finished this tour, I spent some time admiring the facilities and asking for information to one day hope to get an internship in this studio. I would really love to try this, yet the only issue presented is financial, for the transportation would come close to costing at least $30 a week.

Seems like you can find a gem amongst a place that produces such disgust in your mouth.

-Bettina

Stuffed Eagles and Nonsense

So, as my first blog entry, it has become quite the difficult task to come up with something to write, but here it is.

Recently, a fellow student for this class (Printmaking Now, thus the title of this blog) sent everyone a few links. Out of said links, one struck me as quite particular. The link was an article in the New York Times called'Art’s Sale Value? Zero. The Tax Bill? $29 Million' published on 22 july 2012. It mentions how the current owners of Robert Rauschenberg's 'Canyon' must pay an exhorbitant amount of tax for a piece that is, essentially, of no value.

'Canyon', done in a post-war America 1959, features collage elements and mixed media. The reason that adds to it's contoversy is the use of a stuffed bald eagle. The contraversy that resides in this piece is a derrivative of the the 1940 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act. These Acts "make it a crime to possess, sell, purchase, barter, transport, import or export any bald eagle — alive or dead".

The issue presented in this article, aside from a violation of these two acts, is that the I.R.S. is charging an exhorbitant amount of taxes and fees to the owners of this, basically, economically speaking, worthless piece. Taxes upon works of art are usually imposed due to the monetary value of the piece, yet granted that 'Canyon' has no financial value, it is up in question if said taxes and fees should be applied upon the heirs of the original owner, Ileana Sonnabend.

Now that the facts have been stated, I would like to approach this from a more opinionated and personal perspective.

Rauschenberg, creating this piece in a time after these two acts had been imposed, clearly knew this controversy was to arise at some point of his carrer. What the I.R.S. and those that 'give value' a work of art do not comprehend, I believe, is that this is part of the work's powerful statement. Because Rauschenberg did not personally kill nor taxidermy the eagle and used an eagle killed by Teddy Roosvelt's Rough Riders, I believe the artist nor the piece itself, an extension of the artist, should be held accountable to follow these Acts.

Let me explain myself. I believe the eagle within 'Canyon' is part of the piece now, it is not a separate entitiy from the work of art. It is no longer an illegal owned stuffed bald eagle; it is Rauschenberg's 'Canyon' and, because it's a work of art he made, it is an extension of himself.

Tha being said, I believe the work of art should not be subjected to economical technicisims because it has been rejected from a monitary value in the first place. Also, I believe people are looking past the work of art and merely focusing on one element that composes it, which, in all due respect, is quite silly for me.

Cheers,

-Bettina